Far be it for me to be one more voice of hurt in an already swirling cauldron of viciousness, hate, misunderstanding and ignorance. Even though my blog is mostly just what’s up in our lives kind of journal/scrapbook sometimes I have strong opinions that I just need to get out there and since I’m not particularly close to anyone in the physical world at the moment, here is my cosmic rant to the webular space out there. I know hardly anyone reads my blog, I know my words don’t really make a difference but the suffering I feel about the immorality in the world is real and tangible. The constant attack against my family and the way I feel unsafe from the taint is real. I know that people are suffering who struggle with any issue arising from breaking or being tempted to break the law of Chastity.
I believe that when any human suffers we all suffer. And I believe that any form of sin is suffering. And beyond that, I feel intense sorrow about being exposed or exposing my children to such pervasive and widespread immorality. I am angry that people are dispassionate about sin. This doesn’t mean that any person should be persecuted, but when people sin the most loving thing that could be done for them is to call them to repentence and worry more for their eternal happiness then encouraging them to dwell on mortal unhappiness and discontent. My children have a right to be protected from knowing about sexual sins before they can comprehend long division. I am angry to not be protected from sexual sins by my society and community.
Immorality is second only to murder in sins. “By assigning such seriousness to a physical appetite so universally bestowed, what is God trying to tell us about its place in His plan for all men and women? I submit to you He is doing precisely that—commenting about the very plan of life itself. Clearly among His greatest concerns regarding mortality are how one gets into this world and how one gets out of it. He has set very strict limits in these matters.” If no one at conference had said anything pertaining to homosexuality, sexual sin, or pornography wouldn't that have been a lot more hateful then outlining the expectations of God on the subject and offering hope in the Love of God and change through the atonement? As someone who has struggled with sin in my life I feel like it would have been a lot more hurtful to be ignored. At least those with these feelings can find answers of their standing with God if they turn to what the doctrine actually is (not just what people are saying). Remember in our doctrine ignorance is also a sin.
Marriage originated as a protected institution not a right. Our concept of family extends beyond a contractual agreement between two people for a legal arrangement of those two people's physical and emotional needs. In our religion marriage by sealing is a privilege extended only to the most obedient and righteous. We do not view marriage as a right but rather a privilege and responsibility set up to protect the institution of family which we define not only as a man and woman but also the children of that couple. . It considers family to be a social institution set up to provide benefits and protection to a unit made up of husband and wife who are actively engaged in procreation; for the society to support that unit while in mortality. And it extends to spiritual blessings in the world to come, including our eligibility for exaltation. Our doctrinal definition of family has to do directly with genetics and priesthood authority in addition to the qualities that can only be cultivated by self sacrifice best facilitated in day to day living in cooperative units. Therefore, our definition has little to do with celebration or a proclamation of love. Families, have, primitively in every culture been institutions given additional benefits and special consideration in order to provide for the weaker elements of society, with a heavy emphasis on the needs of children. The only reason that two adult people of the same gender would have need of such institution is if they were weaker elements of society according to such definition.
Now, our world is no longer that simple and we have put nuances on marriage that didn't exist previous to things such as no-fault divorce and other legal rulings, but the answer to your question is that our definition of family is different. I am trying to defend what we believe the IDEAL family is, and to strive for that ideal. I believe that marriage is between a husband and wife, and that children are ENTITLED to a family as such. Biologically, this is the only way procreation can occur. Spiritually, we believe this is the best situation for them to learn the gospel of Jesus Christ. Each FAMILY should have that responsibility and priviledge. This isn't a perfect world, many things are not as they should be, a move away from our ideal have caused a breakdown in even our own families. This is wrong. We want to strive more for the ideal. And if things such as violence or adbuse towards two adults of the same gender occur, Families should be held responsible for that as well. But we firmly believe that if we remove that definition of family we will no longer have families by our definition. What would we call the organization to protect biological procreation? We have the right to fight for our definition and ideal.
“One who uses the God-given body of another without divine sanction abuses the very soul of that individual, abuses the central purpose and processes of life.” Equality is not the doctrine of Christianity, How fair is an atonement of one perfect man for all the sins of mankind, neither is hate. However, I believe that Christ took on the sins of all mankind. He taught service, kindness, and sacrifice of the self. Love one another is not a call to assert one's own rights. We have a right and responsibility to fight for our definition of marriage as a protected and institution with special benefits because it was set up to protect the rights of pregnant women, breast- feeding women, children, the elderly, and the disabled. Or are you going to tell me that the government institutions are doing such a great job that we have eliminated the need for the loving care of a biological family? Only the ties of biology have thus far been strong enough to tie the strong members of society to the weaker dependent ones. Only with a strong marriage are people set up to fully care for aberrations to this pattern (infertility, adoption, orphans, and abuse) If people were to act morally, many heartaches and disillusionments of the “ideal family would be resolved.
What about the “rights” of one to express their same sex attraction? Sexual acts are governed by spiritual laws for heterosexuals and homosexuals alike:
“Physical intimacy is not only a symbolic union between a husband and a wife—the very uniting of their souls—but it is also symbolic of a shared relationship between them and their Father in Heaven. He is immortal and perfect. We are mortal and imperfect. Nevertheless we seek ways even in mortality whereby we can unite with Him spiritually. In so doing we gain some access to both the grace and the majesty of His power. Those special moments include kneeling at a marriage altar in the house of the Lord, blessing a newborn baby, baptizing and confirming a new member of the Church, partaking of the emblems of the Lord’s Supper, and so forth.
These are moments when we quite literally unite our will with God’s will, our spirit with His spirit, where communion through the veil becomes very real. At such moments we not only acknowledge His divinity but we quite literally take something of that divinity to ourselves. One aspect of that divinity given to virtually all men and women is the use of His power to create a human body, that wonder of all wonders, a genetically and spiritually unique being never before seen in the history of the world and never to be duplicated again in all the ages of eternity. A child, your child—with eyes and ears and fingers and toes and a future of unspeakable grandeur.
Probably only a parent who has held that newborn infant in his or her arms understands the wonder of which I speak. Suffice it to say that of all the titles God has chosen for Himself,Father is the one He favors most, and creation is His watchword—especially human creation, creation in His image. You and I have been given something of that godliness, but under the most serious and sacred of restrictions. The only control placed on us is self-control—self-control born of respect for the divine sacramental power this gift represents.”
“To be entrusted with the power to create life carries with it the greatest of joys and dangerous temptations. The gift of mortal life and the capacity to kindle other lives is a supernal blessing. Through the righteous exercise of this power, as in nothing else, we may come close to our Father in Heaven and experience a fulness of joy. This power is not an incidental part of the plan of happiness. It is the key—the very key.”
We are not our own. Everything that God has given us, our bodies, our hearts, our very breath is on loan for this period of mortal probation. We are here to be tested to see if we will keep the commandments. The body is to be kept pure and holy. Each person’s very salvation is at sake, for to commit sins of immorality is to risk our very immortal futures. How could we risk that, and how could we do anything but warn our brothers and sisters of the danger? I can’t say everyone is entitled to their own opinion…not when so much is at sake. What we do in mortality determines who we become. Does it matter why we feel to justify breaking a law? No! What matters is immortality and eternal life. I want it for myself, I want it for my children, I want it for all my brothers and sisters who are children of God. I am my brother’s keeper. When one suffers we all suffer. But what suffering is worse, knowing that the ideal family might not be in your grasp in this life, or knowing that you gave it up in the world to come?
“There is something very liberating when an individual determines of his or her own free will to be obedient to our Father and our God and expresses that willingness to Him in prayer.
When we obey, we can enjoy these powers in the covenant of marriage. From our fountains of life will spring our children, our family. Love between husband and wife can be constant and bring fulfillment and contentment all the days of our lives.
If one is denied these blessings in mortality, the promise is that they will be provided for in the world to come.”
So yes this is a big deal. Yes, it matters. And yes all you Mormons who say stupid things based on prejudice and not on doctrine you really need to get with it and figure out what we ACTUALLY believe. And those of you who don't think sin is real, get a clue, it's as real as God. Fight it. My children deserve it.
all quotes can be found here and here
Just throwing that out there

This is absolutely amazing. My wife is amazing and I cherish her testimony of these beautiful truths. There is something special shared in families. The little things each day that we experience and tend to forget. I whole heartedly agree with her stance on this issue and would like to be a witness to her and add my opinion on what I believe to be right concerning this matter of such great worth. It frustrates me so much to see members of the church speak so horribly of the prophet, apostles, leaders, and doctrines of the church. It saddens me greatly to see the church going member criticize the very core of the gospel. I constantly find myself asking, "why would one who is in such disagreement with the church doctrine and leaders even want to remain in the church." Do they think that if they hold out long enough that eventually the church will change its doctrine and cater to their every need and opinion? I admit that I am far from perfect and marriage has taught me so many things that I could never learn being single. I love seeking for truth but I do not believe that it is found by criticizing and fighting what is taught by the leaders of the church. I know without a doubt that the prophets and apostles are men called of God. Their words are truth and we should do all in our power to follow them. It is of utmost importance especially in this day and age. Our eternal salvation is at stake and I know that we will find happiness and joy by so doing.
ReplyDeleteSo what's your take on the huge, vast difference between RELIGIOUS marriage (the wonderful relationship you have with your husband) and CIVIL marriage (a merely legal distinction)?
ReplyDeleteBefore you say they shouldn't be different ~
Religious marriage is a privilege created by God.
But civil marriage?
In America, civil marriage was created for the express purpose of persecuting Native Americans, black people and Hispanics.
The US government started requiring civil marriage certificates because they wanted to prevent whites from marrying blacks, or Native Americans, etc.
It was pure hateful racial bigotry.
So exalt and preserve religious marriage all you want, but be real about the legal/civil thing. They're different.
My point: If you don't want gays having religious marriages under God, then I get that. But to prevent them from having civil marriages... well that just extends the bigotry and hatred that gave birth US legal marriage, and that's flat out wrong. Jesus wouldn't support persecution.
Racism and hatred of minority groups like gay people... those are worse than immorality -- because they're immoralities people actually think they can justify. Jesus was never cruel. He certainly didn't condone sin but he didn't spread hate either.
Is there room for a distinction in this country?
Can we cooperate to end our embarrassing history of hatred?
Can we grant civil marriages as a right and protect religious marriage as a Godly privilege?
What do you think?
PS> People do read your blog, and your words do matter.
ReplyDeleteMake sure you're always spreading love.
Wow, I think you have done a wonderful job explaining our views on this topic. Thanks for your words, Genevieve.
ReplyDeleteGenevieve, I really appreciate your words also. There are many that misunderstand LDS perspective on Gay marriage. The fact is that everyone has the option to choose. We can't force people how to live their lives, but people's choices affect us. Gay marriage would have a huge affect on this country. It would take away any right we have as parents to determine when and what our children hear about gay marriage. It would take away church's abilities to determine what is and isn't allowed.
ReplyDeleteCivil and religious ceremonies CAN'T be different. If it becomes illegal to refuse someone marriage because they are gay you have decided for the churches what doctrine they must teach. Churches would HAVE to perform gay marriages whether they view it a sin or not, or they would lose their tax exempt status. On top of this, it changes the curriculums in school sex ed. in ELEMENTARY schools. Jesus didn't support hatred, but that doesn't mean that he allowed or helped people to commit sin either. Choosing to protect your own rights isn't spreading hatred. I don't hate gay people. They can fight for what they believe and I can too. Claiming that I hate gays because I don't believe in gay marriage is childish. I could say all gays hate traditional families because I think gay marriage would destroy traditional marriage, but that would be ridiculous. They are fighting for what they want, what they feel is fair. That is their right. I am fighting for what I want and what I think is best. That's my right. People can choose to say I hate gays, but I don't. I just want what I think is best for my family and this country. What's truly sad about this whole thing is the lack of respect for the people's voice. I wouldn't be thrilled if gay marriage was permanently allowed, but it wouldn't be right to throw out all of the votes of Californians because I didn't get my way.
Why is it that everytime someone doesn't like something they say people are just doing it out of racism and hatred? The fact is minorities are that, the smaller group. Why is it that the larger group must always bend to the smaller groups desires? Why is what's best for most worse that what's best for a few?
~Tiffany
I for one don't see how anyone can say that someone is being racist or showing hatred towards gays by opposing same sex marriage. It is opposition to an act and does not mean that you hate the participants. For example, if my child does something or wants to do something that I do not agree with, I will certainly oppose it and try as hard as I can to prevent them from doing it. However this does not mean that I do not love my child. If anything I do it entirely out of love for my child. Now I know that I cannot take away my child's free agency but I can teach and persuade them with all my energy so that they will not participate in an undesirable act. So really I see my opposition to same sex marriage as a tremendous act of love towards gays, and not as racism or hatred. The LGBT community might not see it this way but when a friend corrects a friend, it hurts. That doesn't mean that it is bad thing. It means that the friend is sincerely trying to help his friend out.
ReplyDeleteTiffany- Thanks for you POV. I have written this post, because no matter what is decided about same-sex marriage, I am angry because I already feel that "the right to determine when and what out children hear" about any sexual issue is almost a mute point. The honest truth is that I am angry even if same-sex marriage is not passed, I still in this country and society cannot expect my children to be protected by not even the law, but by simple social manners that would exclude common discussion of sex! Sex is something holy to me and I am disgusted that something sacred to me is defiled to the point that I must not only explicitly discuss it outside a proper context...like here on my blog, but I have to educate my children on explicit practices before they are capable of maturely reconciling the information, for fear they will hear it out of context in their second grade classes! You may be right that everyone has the option to choose. But I disagree that we can't compel people how to live their lives. When people do things that are wrong we can have consequences that act as a deterrent to people to act on their impulses. We have laws that protect children against an adult showing their genitalia, yet what punishments are there for sexual explicitly on tv, in the media, in the halls of our schools, ect. Same-sex marriage is such a huge moral issue to me because it is just one more step that our society is making to remove social and political protections from the sacred nature of sex. In my next post I have outlined civil reasons why I believe marriage should be protected, but this post was about why sex should be protected. Maybe my crime in all of this is not being proactive enough to fight other forms of immorality, maybe my crime is letting same-sex marriage be the slap in the face to snap me out of complacency. Indeed sex should be protected within the bonds of a marriage between a man and woman. From a moral standpoint we already lost that right...and I don't remember a vote.
ReplyDelete